---
title: Evolutionary Dynamics of Investors Expectations and Market Price Movement
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/1912.11216/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:1912.11216
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11216
featured: 2023-12-20
citations: 0
topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
---


# Evolutionary Dynamics of Investors Expectations and Market Price Movement

A study introduces a model for predicting market asset prices based on the correlation between investors' expectations and market price movement.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11216
- Identifier: arXiv:1912.11216
- Released: 2019-12-24
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 30 (2023-12-20): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2023-12-20/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 0
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Asset Pricing & Factors

## Related

- [Exploratory Control with Tsallis Entropy for Latent Factor Models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2211.07622/): The research uses Tsallis Entropy in models with latent factors to optimally control and explore the state space, proving that the optimal state distribution is q-Gaussian, which can be used in creating robust statistical arbitrage trading strategies.
- [Empirical Asset Pricing Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4680571/): The paper demonstrates the use of explainable artificial intelligence in empirical asset pricing, showing enhanced predictive power and investment performance when incorporating insights from explainable AI into model refinement.
- [A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Idiosyncratic Tail Risk: Comovement of Momentum and Low Risk Anomalies](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4680248/): Momentum and Low Risk Anomalies: The new model expands the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) by factoring in idiosyncratic tail risk, explaining momentum in stock returns and low risk anomalies.
- [Does Peer-Reviewed Research Help Predict Stock Returns?](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2212.10317/): The research suggests that the predictability of cross-sectional return predictors decreases by half in post-sample scenarios, indicating that theory doesn't improve prediction and peer-review often misinterprets mispricing as risk.
- [The Expected Returns on Machine-Learning Strategies](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4702406/): Despite high turnover rates and the selection of hard-to-arbitrage stocks, machine learning strategies can predict profitable returns that common risk factors cannot explain, according to a study.
- [Machine Learning and the Cross-Section of Emerging Market Corporate Bond Returns](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4632924/): Machine learning models considering nonlinearities and interactions offer better predictions of corporate bond behavior in emerging markets with high transaction costs, with key predictors tied to low-risk macro and momentum factors.