---
title: Can I Trust the Explanations? Investigating Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Monotonic Models
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2309.13246/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2309.13246
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13246
featured: 2023-09-28
citations: 2
topic: ML & AI Methods
---


# Can I Trust the Explanations? Investigating Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Monotonic Models

An Investigation: The study investigates the reliability of scientific explanations when using explainable machine learning methods on science-based machine learning models, showing varying results based on the type of monotonicity.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13246
- Identifier: arXiv:2309.13246
- Released: 2023-09-23
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 17 (2023-09-28): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2023-09-28/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 2
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: ML & AI Methods

## Related

- [Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2407.14435/): The paper presents JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), which provide high-quality reconstruction of language model activations at a specific sparsity level, while maintaining interpretability.
- [Identifying regions of importance in wall-bounded turbulence through explainable deep learning](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2302.01250/): A deep-learning method has been used to analyze energy structures in turbulence, finding that the most significant structures aren't always the ones contributing most to Reynolds shear stress.
- [Finding the right XAI method - A Guide for the Evaluation and Ranking of Explainable AI Methods in Climate Science](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2303.00652/): The paper evaluates different explainable artificial intelligence methods in the context of climate science, comparing their suitability for specific research problems.
- [The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/doi/10-1145-3641022/): A study shows that incorrect explanations from explainable AI (XAI) can influence human decision-making, with the impact varying based on the level of human expertise and the quality of the AI.
- [Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2501.05435/): Neuro-Symbolic AI has grown since 2020, focusing on learning and inference, but still lacks in areas like explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition.
- [Year-over-Year Developments in Financial Fraud Detection via Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.00201/): The study examines progress in deep learning methods for detecting financial fraud, reviewing 57 studies from 2019 to 2024, and discusses challenges and opportunities such as data privacy, feature engineering, and model interpretability.