---
title: The Paradox Of Just-in-Time Liquidity in Decentralized Exchanges: More Providers Can Sometimes Mean Less Liquidity
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2311.18164/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2311.18164
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18164
featured: 2023-12-06
citations: 15
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# The Paradox Of Just-in-Time Liquidity in Decentralized Exchanges: More Providers Can Sometimes Mean Less Liquidity

The research analyzes the paradox of just-in-time (JIT) liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges, which can reduce liquidity, and suggests a two-tiered fee structure to counteract this.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18164
- Identifier: arXiv:2311.18164
- Released: 2023-11-30
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 28 (2023-12-06): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2023-12-06/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 15
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution

## Related

- [Deep reinforcement learning for arbitrage in decentralized exchanges](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4666504/): The study explores trading performances under arbitrage conditions in decentralized exchanges, using a simulation model and deep reinforcement learning to determine optimal arbitrage strategies for eight cryptocurrency pairs.
- [An arbitrage driven price dynamics of Automated Market Makers in the presence of fees](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2401.01526/): The article introduces a model for price dynamics in Automated Market Makers, suggesting a reference market price and deriving several analytical results about its behavior using local times and excursion-theoretic methods.
- [Impermanent Loss Conditions: An Analysis of Decentralized Exchange Platforms](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2401.07689/): The paper explores the issue of impermanent loss in decentralized exchanges through Monte Carlo simulations, indicating that price changes don't always result in losses for liquidity providers and that an arbitrage-friendly environment is beneficial for them.
- [Exploring the Impact: How Decentralized Exchange Designs Shape Traders' Behavior on Perpetual Future Contracts](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2402.03953/): The study analyzes trader behavior on perpetual future contracts in both centralized and decentralized exchanges, focusing on the impact of blockchain technology and the potential risks and benefits in the DeFi sector.
- [Don't Let MEV Slip: The Costs of Swapping on the Uniswap Protocol](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2309.13648/): Efficiency and Slippage Analysis: The research analyzes the costs of trading on a decentralized exchange, showing that costs vary based on trade characteristics, and proposes that DEXs could be a trustworthy alternative to centralized exchanges for trading digital assets.
- [Closed-form solutions for generic N-token AMM arbitrage](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2402.06731/): The article introduces a new mechanism for identifying arbitrage trades on automated markets, providing better opportunities and quicker capitalization than previous methods, and enabling on-chain arbitrage bots for multi-asset pools.