---
title: Case-based Explainability for Random Forest: Prototypes, Critics, Counter-factuals and Semi-factuals
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2408.06679/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2408.06679
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06679
featured: 2024-08-15
citations: 5
topic: ML & AI Methods
---


# Case-based Explainability for Random Forest: Prototypes, Critics, Counter-factuals and Semi-factuals

The study explores Explainable Case-Based Reasoning methods to clarify the results of black-box machine learning algorithms, using a technique to extract the learned distance metric from Random Forests, and assesses their explanatory power.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06679
- Identifier: arXiv:2408.06679
- Released: 2024-08-13
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 61 (2024-08-15): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2024-08-15/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 5
- Published in: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance
- Topic: ML & AI Methods

## Related

- [Enhanced Local Explainability and Trust Scores with Random Forest Proximities](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2310.12428/): The study introduces a new method to explain the performance of random forest models by viewing them as adaptive weighted K nearest-neighbors models, offering a localized understanding of model predictions.
- [Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2407.14435/): The paper presents JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), which provide high-quality reconstruction of language model activations at a specific sparsity level, while maintaining interpretability.
- [The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/doi/10-1145-3641022/): A study shows that incorrect explanations from explainable AI (XAI) can influence human decision-making, with the impact varying based on the level of human expertise and the quality of the AI.
- [Finding the right XAI method - A Guide for the Evaluation and Ranking of Explainable AI Methods in Climate Science](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2303.00652/): The paper evaluates different explainable artificial intelligence methods in the context of climate science, comparing their suitability for specific research problems.
- [Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2501.05435/): Neuro-Symbolic AI has grown since 2020, focusing on learning and inference, but still lacks in areas like explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition.
- [Year-over-Year Developments in Financial Fraud Detection via Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.00201/): The study examines progress in deep learning methods for detecting financial fraud, reviewing 57 studies from 2019 to 2024, and discusses challenges and opportunities such as data privacy, feature engineering, and model interpretability.
