---
title: Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.01931/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2502.01931
source_url: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01931v1
featured: 2025-02-05
citations: 5
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges

The research provides a mathematical examination of liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges, particularly constant function market makers, and investigates conditions for no-arbitrage, the effect of transaction fees on impermanent loss, and the efficiency of the Uniswap v3 platform.

- Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01931v1
- Identifier: arXiv:2502.01931
- Released: 2025-02-04
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 84 (2025-02-05): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2025-02-05/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 5
- Published in: Digital Finance
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution

## Related

- [Equilibrium Reward for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2503.22502/): The study introduces a model to determine the optimal contract an automated market maker offers to liquidity providers, suggesting that more noise trading encourages providers to add liquidity.
- [Concentrated Superelliptical Market Maker](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2410.13265/): The article discusses a new automated market maker model that can handle both negative and positive asset pricing, useful in electricity, energy, and derivatives markets, and compares it to a replicating market maker.
- [Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.02869/): The research investigates the best dynamic fees in Automated Market Makers, suggesting fees that are linear in inventory and sensitive to price changes are optimal.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.
- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [A Tick-by-Tick Solution for Concentrated Liquidity Provisioning](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2405.18728/): Early findings suggest that programmable automated market makers with concentrated liquidity capabilities are not most effective when focused solely on the current price.