---
title: Liquidity Provision and Rebate Design in Option Markets
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.26606/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2609.26606
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26606
featured: 2026-09-25
citations: 0
topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
---


# Liquidity Provision and Rebate Design in Option Markets

Develops a nested optimization model for market making and rebate design in option markets, showing how exchanges can set fees to incentivize liquidity provision and improve market depth.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26606
- Identifier: arXiv:2609.26606
- Released: 2026-09-23
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 132 (2026-09-25): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-09-25/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 0
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Trading, Microstructure & Execution
- Authors: Samuel N. Cohen, Lyndon Drake, Zihan Guo, Christoph Reisinger

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

We provide a model for the nested optimisation problem of market making and rebate design problems in option markets and find optimal strategies. A single market maker trades multiple European call options in a local-stochastic volatility option market with both make and take strategies, modeled, respectively, as continuous and impulse controls. Her objective is to maximize, over all admissible make-take strategies, net profit of option portfolio value and cumulative rebate revenue, subject to a penalty on residual portfolio delta and vega. In addition, we demonstrate how an exchange can incentivize a market maker to improve market liquidity by setting suitable fee rebates, thereby resolving its own liquidity attraction problem. To this end, we propose a three-step rebate design scheme with flexibility to accommodate specific liquidity targets imposed by an exchange. Numerical results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

## Related

- [Optimal Exit Time for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.06510/): The study investigates the best way for a liquidity provider to withdraw liquidity in an automated market, balancing fees and potential losses, and offers insights into dynamic liquidity provision.
- [Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.08152/): The research investigates the earnings of passive liquidity providers in automated markets, suggesting that optimal fees should balance volume attraction and revenue generation, and dynamic fees can enhance results.
- [Performative Market Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2508.04344/): The research shows how financial models can shape market processes and influence price changes, enabling market makers to use dominant strategies.
- [Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2506.02869/): The research investigates the best dynamic fees in Automated Market Makers, suggesting fees that are linear in inventory and sensitive to price changes are optimal.
- [Equilibrium Reward for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2503.22502/): The study introduces a model to determine the optimal contract an automated market maker offers to liquidity providers, suggesting that more noise trading encourages providers to add liquidity.
- [Event-Based Limit Order Book Simulation under a Neural Hawkes Process: Application in Market-Making](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2502.17417/): An event-driven Limit Order Book model using a Neural Hawkes process is proposed to simulate high-frequency dynamics in financial markets, offering a more accurate depiction of trade execution.