arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution
Rule-Based Pricing Algorithms and Market Outcomes: An Experimental Study
Experiments show that algorithm design features like warnings, pre-configured strategies, and LLM advice raise market prices by increasing starting prices and fostering cooperative algorithm designs.
Featured in No. 132 on 25 Sep 2026 · 1 day after release · 0 citations today
- Released
- 24 Sep 2026
- First featured
- No. 132 · 25 Sep 2026
- Citations (Semantic Scholar)
- 0
- Influential citations
- 0
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 2 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2609.26861
- Authors
- Adrian Hillenbrand et al.
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
Rule-based pricing tools are widespread in digital commerce, yet we know little about how their design shapes market outcomes. In a controlled market experiment, participants use dashboards to build pricing algorithms competing in a sequential Bertrand game over multiple periods. We vary design features commonly found in commercial repricing tools: warnings about price wars, pre-configured strategies, and advice from a large language model. Most treatment variations raise market prices with effects driven by an increase in starting prices and more cooperative algorithm designs. The results matter for competition policy, platform regulation and current discussions on regulating algorithm design tools.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).