Financial Tail Risk Beyond Lipschitz Continuity via Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport

Financial returns are heavy-tailed, and accurate tail risk estimation is central to portfolio risk management. Modern neural generators sample by pushing a simple base distribution through a learned map, and for training stability that map is built from Lipschitz components. This is the binding constraint: a Lipschitz map of a Gaussian is sub-Gaussian, so heavier-tailed targets admit no exact match at any finite Lipschitz constant. The Monge--Ampère equation ties the Brenier map's local distortion to the density ratio $f/(g\circ T)$, so a deeper trough in the target density requires a higher-gain map and yields a higher-variance estimator. The argument needs only bounded distortion, so it covers normalizing flows, flow matching, GANs, and diffusion samplers alike. Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport (SDOT) relaxes the map's regularity rather than the source's tail class. Its power diagram gives every training observation a cell holding exactly $1/N$ of the source measure, and tail observations are reached by crossing a cell boundary rather than by stretching. Our primary experiment sweeps severity over a calibrated Merton jump-diffusion spanning kurtosis 94 to 1,679. SDOT holds tail ratios at $0.85$--$0.94$ with cross-seed standard deviations below $0.025$, while every learned generator either compresses the tails or inflates them with a variance that grows alongside. Further experiments carry the result to real S\&P~500 returns and to a 21-year backtest, where SDOT gives the best risk-adjusted market-neutral strategy under CVaR optimization (Sharpe $0.70$, max drawdown $-2.60\%$, against $0.40$ for the next-best generator).

1. 22 Sep 2025

   A note on subadditivity of value at risks (VaRs): A new connection to comonotonicity

   The research reveals a new characteristic of value at risk (VaR), stating that its subadditivity holds for any confidence level only if the loss random variables are comonotonic.

   arXivIn J. Appl. Probab.

   5cites
2. 1 Jan 2025

   Quantiles under ambiguity and risk sharing

   The study introduces Choquet Expected Shortfall, a new class of risk measures, and provides optimization algorithms and examples using financial data.

   arXiv

   2cites
3. 31 Oct 2024

   Time-Series Foundation AI Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting

   The research highlights the superior performance of a time-series model, TimesFM, in forecasting Value-at-Risk, with fine-tuning further enhancing the results.

   arXiv

   8cites
4. 21 Aug 2024

   Optimal insurance design with Lambda-Value-at-Risk

   The paper studies optimal insurance solutions using the Lambda-Value-at-Risk model, revealing that a truncated stop-loss indemnity is ideal under certain conditions and discusses the effect of model uncertainty.

   arXivIn Eur. J. Oper. Res.

   7cites
5. 15 Aug 2024

   Adaptive Multilevel Stochastic Approximation of the Value-at-Risk

   The paper introduces a multilevel stochastic approximation algorithm that adaptively selects the number of inner samples to compute the value-at-risk of a financial loss, improving the previous scheme's complexity.

   arXiv

   5cites
6. 7 Aug 2024

   Risk sharing with lambda value-at-risk under heterogeneous beliefs

   The research investigates risk distribution among multiple parties using Lambda value at risk, offering formulas for optimal allocations under differing beliefs.

   arXivIn Finance and Stochastics

   5cites