arXivTrading, Microstructure & Execution
Liquidity Provision and Rebate Design in Option Markets
Develops a nested optimization model for market making and rebate design in option markets, showing how exchanges can set fees to incentivize liquidity provision and improve market depth.
Featured in No. 132 on 25 Sep 2026 · 2 days after release · 0 citations today
- Released
- 23 Sep 2026
- First featured
- No. 132 · 25 Sep 2026
- Citations (Semantic Scholar)
- 0
- Influential citations
- 0
- Published in
- Not yet, as far as Semantic Scholar knows
- Fanfare
- 2 of 5
- Identifier
- arXiv:2609.26606
- Authors
- Samuel N. Cohen et al.
Abstract
From arXiv (CC0).
We provide a model for the nested optimisation problem of market making and rebate design problems in option markets and find optimal strategies. A single market maker trades multiple European call options in a local-stochastic volatility option market with both make and take strategies, modeled, respectively, as continuous and impulse controls. Her objective is to maximize, over all admissible make-take strategies, net profit of option portfolio value and cumulative rebate revenue, subject to a penalty on residual portfolio delta and vega. In addition, we demonstrate how an exchange can incentivize a market maker to improve market liquidity by setting suitable fee rebates, thereby resolving its own liquidity attraction problem. To this end, we propose a three-step rebate design scheme with flexibility to accommodate specific liquidity targets imposed by an exchange. Numerical results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Citations and venue from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY), refreshed weekly. Summary: Quant Letter (CC BY 4.0).